Post by elizabeth grot on Oct 20, 2011 19:48:51 GMT -5
i think this proboards needs the debate/discussion section to be more organized. the albany proboards site was a little discombobulated that how i came to this conclusion early on with saratoga's site. i would like there to be a fourth section labels structured discussions, with the following subheading in which people can add their own thread of discussion. this will allow us to see the diversity of thought present within the saratoga movement and educate each other about our viewpoints. perhaps we can find greater synthesis within the movement within these discussions. i think that consensus is the goal. and consensus cannot be reached with discussion. on this site it requires doesnt the fascilitators, stackers, etc. of the consensus movement. it only requires participation. consensus will be more easily reaches after all voices are heard and given proper consideration and rumination. i think this site is a perfect place to have these discussion and their relationship to the present movement. please include the following subheadings. i am not a moderator of the site but i would seriously suggest organizing the structured debates section with the subheadings economics, politics, education, military, food, shelter, environment, human rights, worker rights, animal welfare, employment, copyrights/patents, business. please reply with support to this thread if you agree that it would be worth while to have organized discussion of these topics rather than seeing them scattered under one subheading. and feel free to add to the list of discussion if they dont fit one of the suggested subcategories i have listed.
